不服!弗兰克:不理解西蒙斯为何改判红牌,也不理解罗梅罗吃第二张黄牌(弗兰克质疑判罚:不理解西蒙斯改判红牌,同样不解罗梅罗吃到第二张黄牌)
发布时间:2026-01-01

Asking for Clarification on VAR Decisions

ask

I want to clarify which football match the user is referring to regarding a red card being overruled by VAR. It could involve a referee named Simmons and a player named Romero, possibly from Tottenham or Argentina. To help, I need to ask about specific details like the match, league, and date.

ion

I'll also provide a brief explanation of how VAR works with red cards, second yellow cards, and typical reasons for such decisions. I'll keep my notes concise and helpful, using bullet points for clarity.Explaining VAR Rules and Requests

球是否可玩

In Serie A, there seems to be some uncertainty regarding Michael Fabbri. I think it's better to ask for clarification. I’ll provide a simple explanation about VAR: it can only intervene for straight red cards, penalties, goals, or mistaken identity — not for second yellow cards. The referee alone handles those changes.

I should also mention important reasons for red card upgrades, like DOGSO and Serious Foul Play, noting practical differences in contact. At the end, I'll ask the user for details like the match name or link to further assist.

看起来你在说一场有争议的判罚:主裁(你写“西蒙斯”)把某次犯规改判为红牌,罗梅罗又因为第二张黄牌被罚下。先给你几个要点,帮你快速定位争议点:

  • VAR介入范围:VAR只能建议主裁复核“红牌直接罚下、点球、进球、身份错误”。第二张黄牌不在VAR范围内,所以罗梅罗的第二黄只能由主裁自行判定,VAR不会推翻。
  • 红牌改判的常见依据:严重犯规(SFP)或阻止明显得分机会(DOGSO)。判据通常看接触点(是否踩踏/踝部以上)、门钉外露、速度与力量、球是否可玩到、对手受保护程度等。
  • DOGSO四要素:距离球门、控球可能性、进攻方向、后卫人数/位置。若满足且非合理争抢球,通常红牌;若是合理争抢球且在禁区内,某些联赛会改为点球+黄牌(避免双重处罚,但具体看赛事适用条款与解释)。
  • 第二张黄牌常见原因:鲁莽放铲/拉拽、阻止快发、手球、过度抱怨、拖延时间、庆祝越界等。很多看“鲁莽”与“战术性犯规”的判定尺度。
  • 为什么会“不理解”:争议往往集中在接触强度是否达“严重犯规”门槛、是否存在控球/得分的“明显”要素、以及罗梅罗那一下是否更像普通战术犯规(黄)还是边界动作(可警告但情境较轻)。

如果你能告诉我具体是哪场比赛(联赛/对阵/时间)或给个回放时间点/片段链接:

from

  • 我可以按IFAB第12条(犯规与不当行为)逐条对照,解释主裁把黄改红的技术理由;并评估罗梅罗的第二张黄是否符合“鲁莽/战术性”的操作标准。
  • 也可以参考该联赛赛后裁判机构(如PGMOL等)的说明,看看是否有官方复盘或音频释疑。